Weâve been thinking about software development all wrong. We call ourselves âsoftware engineers,â implying we build bridgesâpermanent structures, engineered once, standing forever. But software isnât a bridge. Itâs a farm. đą
In academia, we teach agricultureâthe science of perfect conditions:
But the industry needs farmersâpeople who work the actual land:
The difference? Agriculture happens in laboratories. Farming happens in the mud, during a thunderstorm, with broken equipment.
A bridge, once built, stands unchanged for decades. Software? Itâs alive:
Youâre not building softwareâyouâre growing it.
Every farmer knows you canât plant corn in winter. Software has seasons too:
đ¸ Spring (New Projects): Plant seeds carefully, but donât over-plan. You canât predict every storm.
âď¸ Summer (Growth Phase): Rapid expansion. Some weeds are acceptableâyou canât stop to perfect every line while the crop is growing.
đ Fall (Maturity): Harvest features. Prepare for the maintenance season ahead.
âď¸ Winter (Legacy Mode): Survival mode. Keep systems running. Prepare the soil for eventual replanting.
The wisdom isnât knowing best practicesâitâs knowing which season youâre in.
You planned microservices. The board wants it shipped next week. You have two developers.
A farmer doesnât refuse to plant because they lack a GPS-guided tractor. They use what they have. Add a module to your monolith. Ship it. Refactor next season if the crop sells well.
Farmers donât buy combines to impress other farmers. They buy tools that:
Software teams should think the same way:
Good farmers buy tools that help them farm better, not tools that win awards at the county fair.
Forget two-week sprints. Nature doesnât work in arbitrary timeboxes.
No standup theater. Just simple questions:
Stop thinking like an engineer building monuments. Start thinking like a farmer growing systems:
Engineer Mindset | Farmer Mindset |
---|---|
âThis code is perfectâ | âThis code works for nowâ |
âWe need to refactor everythingâ | âWeâll improve it next seasonâ |
âFollow best practicesâ | âUse what works for our landâ |
âControl all variablesâ | âAdapt to conditionsâ |
âMy code is elegantâ | âMy system produces valueâ |
Features take time to mature. Pushing harder doesnât make corn grow fasterâit just stresses the plant.
That legacy system that works? Maybe leave it alone this season. Not everything needs constant optimization.
Donât let one developer own one system forever. Rotate responsibilities like crop rotationâit keeps the soil (and knowledge) healthy.
Monitoring, logging, error handlingâthese are fences. Build them before the cattle escape.
Requirements will change. Systems will fail. Team members will leave. Plan for adaptation, not prevention.
Engineers measure elegance, performance, test coverage.
Farmers measure differently:
We donât need more software architects designing perfect systems. We need software farmers who can:
The next time someone asks you about your development methodology, tell them: âWe farm.â
Because at the end of the day, shipping working software that solves real problems beats architectural perfection that never sees production. Ask any farmerâa good harvest beats a perfect plan every time.
Remember: Perfect is the enemy of shipped. Good farmers know when to plant, when to tend, and when to harvest. The wisdom is knowing which season youâre in.